by Bongo Boy » Thu Jan 31, 2002 6:12 am
..not sure I'm following you. What part of this thread got you to thinking about notation and books vs practical experience, etc.? I think we ended up talking about something like reading substituting for practice, or something like that.
Originally, I was having what I thought might be problem with heel-tip technique. I noted that this forum includes recommendations that contradicts what I see elsewhere, and you recommended getting a live instructor. Seems like good advice--but the question now is, how can a beginner know if an instructor is 'qualified'?
Here's my point. Bobby Sanabria and Miguel Diaz are, as far as I know, both good players. Now, Bobby may not be as dedicated to conga as Miguel, but I know I'm not qualified to say which of the two is 'better'. BUT, I have video of both of them, and their advise for the heel-tip technique is totally contradictory. Bobby says you use the heel, Miguel says specifically you DON"T.
Okay, let's assume they can both play conga--how would I ever KNOW if one of them is 'right' and the other 'wrong', or if one teacher will screw me up in my training?
Now let's make it real--I have to pick a teacher I've never heard of, no one has ever heard of, and who may not even play conga as his/her primary instrument. I feel I have to make a choice, go for it, and hope for the best. Do you see how this can cause a little stress?
This isn't an issue of expecting to become proficient in 90 days, it's not an issue of mechanically playing to sheet music vs getting in the groove. It's more a matter of trying to gain a consensus from all those who claim to know, and who all have often differing opinions. Does that make sense?